Story image

Google’s hacking contest ‘Project Zero’ was a flop: What went wrong?

11 Apr 2017

Not a single person claimed Google’s Project Zero prizes, even after six months of being open to participants.

The Project Zero campaign aimed to attract participants who could find a remote vulnerability or bug chain on Android devices - but they could only use the device’s phone number and email address.

The company aimed to gain insights about how remote Android exploits work - and admitted that it’s rare to see one in action. 

A US$200,000 reward was offered for first price, second prize was worth US$100,000 and at least $50,000 to third prize entries.

In a blog post last month, Project Zero’s Natalie Silvanovich says that there were a number of factors that caused the project to fail.

She says that there were no valid entries or bugs - instead there was just spam and entries that did not resemble what the company was after.

After speaking to teams who had planned to submit entries but did not do so, the Project Zero organisers found that there were significant problems with their campaign.

Silvanovich explains that fully remote Android bugs aren’t often reported.  While most bugs require victim input such as clicking a link, it was forbidden as part of the contest.

She also suggests that bugs of this nature take time - perhaps the timeframe and reward amount wasn’t enough to attract interest.

The prize amounts could have also been too low in regards to the type of bugs Project Zero was looking for.

She also cites other competitions of a similar nature and participants chose to save their bugs for those contests. 

While the project did encourage people to come forth with partial bug chains, even if they didn’t have the full one. Users were allowed to use bugs they’d filed at any point. If they weren’t used as part of the chain, they would have received Android Security Rewards.

“We expected these rules to encourage participants to file any bugs they found immediately, as only the first finder could use a specific bug, and multiple reports of the same Android bug are fairly common. Instead, some participants chose to save their bugs for other contests that had lower prize amounts but allowed user interaction, and accept the risk that someone else might report them in the meantime,” Silvanovich says in the blog.

Project Zero is also looking for feedback from users about how the rules or contest affected their participation.

Why 'right to repair' legislation could be a new lease on life for broken devices
“These companies are profiting at the expense of our environment and our pocketbooks as we become a throw-away society that discards over 6 million tonnes of electronics every year.”
Attacks targeting Cisco Webex extension explode in popularity - WatchGuard
WatchGuard's Internet Security Report for Q4 2018 also finds growing use of a new sextortion phishing malware customised to individual victims.
SAS partners with NVIDIA on deep learning and computer vision
“By partnering with NVIDIA, we combine our strengths to augment human intelligence and realise the true potential of AI.” 
Why businesses must embrace automation to ensure success
“For many younger workers, the traditional view of a steady job at one company, perhaps for life, simply doesn’t reflect reality."
Dropbox invests in hosting data inside Australia
Global collaboration platform Dropbox has announced it will now host Australian customer files onshore to support its growing base in the country.
TYAN unveils new inference-optimised GPU platforms with NVIDIA T4 accelerators
“TYAN servers with NVIDIA T4 GPUs are designed to excel at all accelerated workloads, including machine learning, deep learning, and virtual desktops.”
Worldwide spending on security to reach $103.1bil in 2019 - IDC
Managed security services will be the largest technology category in 2019.
How Cognata and NVIDIA enable autonomous vehicle simulation
“Cognata and NVIDIA are creating a robust solution that will efficiently and safely accelerate autonomous vehicles’ market entry."