Story image

Google’s hacking contest ‘Project Zero’ was a flop: What went wrong?

11 Apr 17

Not a single person claimed Google’s Project Zero prizes, even after six months of being open to participants.

The Project Zero campaign aimed to attract participants who could find a remote vulnerability or bug chain on Android devices - but they could only use the device’s phone number and email address.

The company aimed to gain insights about how remote Android exploits work - and admitted that it’s rare to see one in action. 

A US$200,000 reward was offered for first price, second prize was worth US$100,000 and at least $50,000 to third prize entries.

In a blog post last month, Project Zero’s Natalie Silvanovich says that there were a number of factors that caused the project to fail.

She says that there were no valid entries or bugs - instead there was just spam and entries that did not resemble what the company was after.

After speaking to teams who had planned to submit entries but did not do so, the Project Zero organisers found that there were significant problems with their campaign.

Silvanovich explains that fully remote Android bugs aren’t often reported.  While most bugs require victim input such as clicking a link, it was forbidden as part of the contest.

She also suggests that bugs of this nature take time - perhaps the timeframe and reward amount wasn’t enough to attract interest.

The prize amounts could have also been too low in regards to the type of bugs Project Zero was looking for.

She also cites other competitions of a similar nature and participants chose to save their bugs for those contests. 

While the project did encourage people to come forth with partial bug chains, even if they didn’t have the full one. Users were allowed to use bugs they’d filed at any point. If they weren’t used as part of the chain, they would have received Android Security Rewards.

“We expected these rules to encourage participants to file any bugs they found immediately, as only the first finder could use a specific bug, and multiple reports of the same Android bug are fairly common. Instead, some participants chose to save their bugs for other contests that had lower prize amounts but allowed user interaction, and accept the risk that someone else might report them in the meantime,” Silvanovich says in the blog.

Project Zero is also looking for feedback from users about how the rules or contest affected their participation.

Virtustream launches cloud automation and security capabilities
Virtustream Enterprise Cloud enhancements accelerate time-to-value for enterprises moving mission critical apps to the cloud.
TCS collaborates with Red Hat to build digital transformation solutions
“By leveraging TCS' technology skills to build more secure, intelligent and responsive solutions, we aim to deliver superior end-user experiences."
Twitter suspects state-sponsored ties to support forum breach
One of Twitter’s support forums was hit by a data breach that may have ties to a state-sponsored attack, however users' personal data was exposed.
How McAfee aims to curb enterprise data loss
McAfee DLP aims to help safeguard intellectual property and ensure compliance by protecting sensitive data.
HPE promotes 'circular economy' for end-of-use tech
HPE is planning to show businesses worldwide that throwing old tech and assets into landfill is not the best option when it comes to end-of-use disposal.
2018 sees 1,500% increase in coinmining malware - report
This issue will only continue to grow as IoT forms the foundation of connected devices and smart city grids.
CSPs ‘not capable enough’ to meet 5G demands of end-users
A new study from Gartner produced some startling findings, including the lack of readiness of communications service providers (CSPs).
Oracle announces a new set of cloud-native managed services
"Developers should have the flexibility to build and deploy their applications anywhere they choose without the threat of cloud vendor lock-in.”